Relativity

This post is a response to a reader’s comments (Vivian Robinson) about an article I wrote for the “Australian Physics” magazine, which is published by the Australian Institute of Physics (AIP).

The article was titled “Moving clocks do not run slow”. It did NOT challenge the theory of special relativity (SR) but discussed a pedagogical issue in relation to SR (an issue of how SR is taught).Read More →

This post is a response to a reader’s comments (Don Koks) about an article I wrote for the “Australian Physics” magazine, which is published by the Australian Institute of Physics (AIP).

The article was titled “Moving clocks do not run slow”. It did NOT challenge the theory of special relativity (SR) but discussed a pedagogical issue in relation to SR (an issue of how SR is taught).Read More →

This post is a response to a reader’s comments (Jim Hodges) about an article I wrote for the “Australian Physics” magazine, which is published by the Australian Institute of Physics (AIP).

The article was titled “Moving clocks do not run slow”. It did NOT challenge the theory of special relativity (SR) but discussed a pedagogical issue in relation to SR (an issue of how SR is taught).Read More →

This is an introduction to a set of posts about an article I wrote for the “Australian Physics” magazine, which is published by the Australian Institute of Physics (AIP).

The article was titled “Moving clocks do not run slow”. It did NOT challenge the theory of special relativity (SR) but discussed a pedagogical issue in relation to SR (an issue of how SR is taught).Read More →